top of page

Innovative trial designs using Electronic Health Record Systems 

Clinical trials are increasingly being designed to fit more seamlessly within routine healthcare. Several innovative trial designs embed elements of the research process directly into Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems, allowing research to take place at the point of care.

One exciting development is the integration of randomisation into the EHR architecture. This has the potential to make trials more efficient, reduce the burden of conducting research, and generate evidence that is closely aligned with everyday healthcare practice.

Examples of emerging approaches include:

electronic Point Of Care Randomisation trials

Wilson et al, 2022

Random Invitation Single Arm Trials

 Jauniad et al 2025 

Decision Architecture Randomised Trials

Flory et al, 2023

The Decision Architecture Randomised Trial

2.png

EHR systems have a “decision architecture”. This refers to how prescribing choices are presented, such as the orderset of treatment options. Clinicians tend to choose the option that appears first in the orderset (the default option). 

For example, an EHR order set might randomly default to one commonly used treatment or another. This gently nudges clinicians towards the randomly assigned option, while allowing them to override the default at any time. This allows different approaches to care to be compared while preserving clinician and patient autonomy and embedding research within routine healthcare.

Ongoing DART projects

1. Gabapentin And Breast Surgery Decision Architecture Randomization Trial (GABS-DART)

United States

​First DART aiming to assess whether gabapentin should be a standard component of peri-operative pain control in mastectomy patients. 

Read more here

2. Tackling important (but hard to fund) questions in bowel disease: assessing the feasibility of decision architecture randomised trials in routine care

United Kingdom

A feasibility study funded by Bowel Research UK, exploring the acceptability and implementation of DARTs in NHS settings.

3. Developing publicly legitimate informed consent for DARTs using deliberative democracy methods 

United Kingdom

A PhD project exploring what informed consent approaches the public finds acceptable and legitimate using a Citizens' Assembly approach. 

Read more here

DARTs and related publications

Decision architecture randomisation: extremely efficient clinical trials that preserve clinician and patient choice?

James Flory, Jessica S Ancker, Scott Yung Ho Kim, Gillard Kuperman, Andrew Vickers

2024

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112386

Individualized clinical decisions within standard-of-care pragmatic clinical trials: Implications for consent

Isabel M Astrachan, James Flory, Scott Yung Ho Kim

2024

https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745241266155

Circles_and_vignette-full-BG.jpg
bottom of page